segunda-feira, 25 de agosto de 2008

Notícias várias


A Realidade Concisamente
Os 254 alunos da escola primária de Ziegelwasser (França) renunciaram ao uso de TV, computador e consoles de videogame durante dez dias, sob o olhar de especialistas. O ambiente nas casas melhorou, os pais conversaram com os filhos nas refeições ou leram histórias para eles à noite.

Estados Unidos: Jornada mariana para ítalo-americanos
O evento foi realizado na sede da TFP norte-americana, numa das comemorações para celebrar as aparições de Nossa Senhora de Fátima há 91 anos
Muitos italianos que imigraram para os Estados Unidos, mesmo depois de várias décadas de permanência nesse país

Itália: Peregrinação a San Giovanni Rotondo
Nessa cidade italiana, marcada pela vida do Padre Pio — também conhecido como São Pio de Pietrelcina —, são expostas as relíquias desse santo sacerdote

Intelectual italiano realça centenário do nascimento de Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira
Numa série de três extensos artigos, que constituem um verdadeiro estudo, o Prof. Massimo Introvigne


Fundadores.

quarta-feira, 20 de agosto de 2008

Pura coincidência em Roraima?

O quadro abaixo retrata o mapa do estado de Roraima. Atente-se para a 'coincidência' ...


 


 


 


As partes em cinza são as reservas generosamente demarcadas para alguns poucos índios.


E os pontinhos vermelhos? Serão tribos indígenas? Malocas étnicas? Não! 
São reservas de minérios como Nióbio, Tântalo, Ouro, Urânio, Tório e Diamante!


 


A situação é muito grave!


O Brasil assinou na ONU a 'Declaração Universal dos Direitos dos Povos Indigenas'. Só falta ser aprovada pelo Congresso Nacional para se transferir para as 'Nações Indígenas' toda essa riqueza....


É por essa razão que milhares de ONGs de diferentes países atuam junto aos índios da Amazônia!


 


Fonte: GPS do Agronegócio


http://www.paznocampo.org.br/

 

segunda-feira, 18 de agosto de 2008

The Truth at the Heart of 'The Da Vinci Code' : NPR

The Truth at the Heart of 'The Da Vinci Code'

by Elaine Pagels

NPR.org, May 22, 2006 · Archbishop Angelo Amato, a top Vatican official, recently railed against The Da Vinci Code as a work "full of calumnies, offenses and historical and theological errors.'' As a historian, I would agree that no reputable scholar has ever found evidence of author Dan Brown's assertion that Jesus and Mary Magdalene married and had a child, and no scholar would take seriously Brown's conspiracy theories about the Catholic group Opus Dei.

But what is compelling about Brown's work of fiction, and part of what may be worrying Catholic and evangelical leaders, is not the book's many falsehoods.

What has kept Brown on the bestseller list for years and inspired a movie is, instead, what is true – that some views of Christian history were buried for centuries because leaders of the early Catholic Church wanted to present one version of Jesus' life: theirs.

Some of the alternative views of who Jesus was and what he taught were discovered in 1945 when a farmer in Egypt accidentally dug up an ancient jar containing more than 50 ancient writings. These documents include gospels that were banned by early church leaders, who declared them blasphemous.

It is not surprising that The Da Vinci Code builds on the idea that many early gospels were hidden and previously unknown. Brown has said that part of his inspiration was one of these so-called Gnostic Gospels as presented in a book I wrote on the subject. It took only three lines from the Gospel of Philip to send Brown off to write his novel:

The companion of the savior is Mary Magdalene. And Jesus loved her more than all the disciples, and used to kiss her often... The rest of the disciples were jealous, and said to him, "Why do you love her more than all of us?''

Those who have studied the Gospel of Philip see it as a mystical text and don't take the suggestion that Jesus had a sexual relationship with Mary Magdalene literally.

Still, by homing in on that passage and building a book around it, Brown brought up subjects that the Catholic Church would like to avoid. He raised the big what-ifs: What if the version of Jesus' life that Christians are taught isn't the right one? And perhaps as troubling in a still-patriarchal church: What if Mary Magdalene played a more important role in Jesus' life than we've been led to believe, not as his wife perhaps, but as a beloved and valued disciple?

In other words, what Brown did with his runaway hit was popularize awareness of the discovery of many other secret gospels, including the Gospel of Judas that was published in April.

There have long been hints that the New Testament wasn't the only version of Jesus' life that existed, and that even the gospels presented there were subject to misinterpretation. In 1969, for instance, the Catholic Church ruled that Mary Magdalene was not a prostitute, as many people had been taught. The church blamed the error on Pope Gregory the Great, who in 591 A.D. gave a sermon in which he apparently conflated several women in the Bible, including Mary Magdalene and an unnamed sinner who washes Jesus' feet with her tears.

But even that news didn't reach all Christians, and it is the rare religious leader who now works hard to spread the word that the New Testament is just one version of events crafted in the intellectual free-for-all after Christ's death. At that time, church leaders were competing with each other to figure out what Christ said, what he meant -- and perhaps most important, what writings would best support the emerging church.

What we know now is that the scholars who championed the "Gnostic'' gospels are among the ones who lost the battle.

In the decades after Jesus' death, these texts and many others were circulating widely among Christian groups from Egypt to Rome, Africa to Spain, and from today's Turkey and Syria to France. So many Christians throughout the world knew and revered these books that it took more than 200 years for hardworking church leaders who denounced the texts to successfully suppress them.

The copies discovered in 1945, for example, were taken from the sacred library of one of the earliest monasteries in Egypt, founded about 10 years after the conversion of Constantine, the first Roman emperor to join the fledgling church. For the first time, Christians were no longer treated as members of a dangerous and seditious group and could form open communities in which many lived together. Like monks today, they kept in their monastery libraries a very wide range of books they read aloud for inspiration.

But these particular texts appeared to upset Athanasius, then archbishop of Alexandria; in the year 367 he sent out an Easter Letter to monks all over Egypt ordering them to reject what he called "illegitimate and secret books.'' Apparently, some monks at the Egyptian monastery defied the archbishop's order and took more than 50 of the books out of the library, sealed them in a heavy jar and buried them under the cliff where they were found 1,600 years later.

In ordering the books destroyed, Athanasius was continuing the battle against the "Gnostic'' gospels begun 200 years earlier by his revered predecessor, Bishop Irenaeus, who was so distressed that certain Christians in his congregations in rural Gaul (present day France) treasured such "illegitimate and secret writing'' that he labeled them heretics. Irenaeus insisted that of the dozens of writings revered by various Christians, only four were genuine -- and these, as you guessed already, are those now in the New Testament, called by the names of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

Irenaeus said there could be only four gospels because, according to the science of the time, there were four principal winds and four pillars that hold up the sky. Why these four gospels? He explained that only they were actually written by eyewitnesses of the events they describe -- Jesus' disciples Matthew and John, or by Luke and Mark, who were disciples of the disciples.

Few scholars today would agree with Irenaeus. We cannot verify who actually wrote any of these accounts, and many scholars agree that the disciples themselves are not likely to be their authors. Beyond that, nearly all the gospels that Irenaeus detested are also attributed to disciples -- some, including the Gospel of Thomas, to the original 12 apostles. Nonetheless, Athanasius and other church leaders succeeded in suppressing the gospels they (and Irenaeus) called illegitimate, won the emperor's favor and succeeded in dominating the church.

What, then, do these texts say, and why did certain leaders find them so threatening?

First, they suggest that the way to God can be found by anyone who seeks. According to the Gospel of Thomas, Jesus suggests that when we come to know ourselves at the deepest level, we come to know God: "If you bring forth what is within you, what you bring forth will save you.'' This message – to seek for oneself – was not one that bishops like Irenaeus appreciated: Instead, he insisted, one must come to God through the church, "outside of which,'' he said, "there is no salvation.''

Second, in texts that the bishops called "heresy,'' Jesus appears as human, yet one through whom the light of God now shines. So, according to the Gospel of Thomas, Jesus said, "I am the light that is before all things; I am all things; all things come forth from me; all things return to me. Split a piece of wood, and I am there; lift up a rock, and you will find me there.'' To Irenaeus, the thought of the divine energy manifested through all creation, even rocks and logs, sounded dangerously like pantheism. People might end up thinking that they could be like Jesus themselves and, in fact, the Gospel of Philip says,

"Do not seek to become a Christian, but a Christ.'' As Irenaeus read this, it was not mystical language, but "an abyss of madness, and blasphemy against Christ.''

Worst of all, perhaps, was that many of these secret texts speak of God not only in masculine images, but also in feminine images. The Secret Book of John tells how the disciple John, grieving after Jesus was crucified, suddenly saw a vision of a brilliant light, from which he heard Jesus' voice speaking to him: "John, John, why do you weep? Don't you recognize who I am? I am the Father; I am the Mother; and I am the Son.'' After a moment of shock, John realizes that the divine Trinity includes not only Father and Son but also the divine Mother, which John sees as the Holy Spirit, the feminine manifestation of the divine.

But the Gospel of Mary Magdalene -- along with the Gospel of Thomas, the Dialogue of the Savior, and the Gospel of Philip -– all show Peter, the leader of the disciples, challenging the presence of women among the disciples. We hear Peter saying to Jesus, "Tell Mary to leave us, because women are not worthy of (spiritual) life.'' Peter complains that Mary talks too much, displacing the role of the male disciples. But Jesus tells Peter to stop, not Mary! No wonder these texts were not admitted into the canon of a church that would be ruled by an all-male clergy for 2,000 years.

Those possibilities opened by the "Gnostic'' gospels -- that God could have a feminine side and that Jesus could be human -- are key ideas that Dan Brown explored in "The Da Vinci Code,'' and are no doubt part of what made the book so alluring. But the truth is that the texts he based his novel upon contain much deeper and more important mysteries than the ones Tom Hanks tries to solve in the movie version that opened this weekend.

The real mystery is what Christianity and Western civilization would look like had the "Gnostic'' gospels never been banned. Because of the discovery by that Egyptian farmer in 1945, we now at least have the chance to hear what the "heretics'' were saying, and imagine what might have been.

Elaine Pagels, author of The Gnostic Gospels and Beyond Belief: The Secret Gospel of Thomas, is a professor of religion at Princeton. She wrote this article for the Perspective section of the San Jose Mercury News.

The Truth at the Heart of 'The Da Vinci Code' : NPR.

quinta-feira, 14 de agosto de 2008

Anatel Homologa iPhone 3G para Venda no Brasil | BaixeBr Download | Tecnologia Dicas e Tutoriais

Vitrine

O aparelho que funcionará no Brasil em três freqüências de banda larga, segundo a Anatel, foi lançado no dia 11 de julho em cerca de 209 países e vendeu mais de 1 milhão de unidades apenas no primeiro fim de semana. No total, a expectativa é que o celular chegue a 70 países até o fim do ano.

As empresas Claro e Vivo já anunciaram acordos que permitirão negociar o celular no mercado brasileiro.

A Claro informou que mais de 100 mil consumidores já preencheram o formulário da empresa e terão prioridade quando o celular estiver a venda.

Segundo a Apple, o acesso a internet do iPhone 3G é 36% mais rápido que outros telefones com a tecnologia de internet rápida, como o Nokia N95 por exemplo.. O aparelho também terá sistema de navegação por GPS, outro sistema que era reivindicado pelos usuários.

A companhia também repaginou suavemente o visual de seu produto, mostrando um aparelho mais fino nas bordas e em tom mais escuro, também prometeu uma bateria com maior autonomia, esperar para ver!
Brasileiros dizem ter desbloqueado iPhone 3G

Dois brasileiros dizem ter desbloqueado o iPhone 3G da Apple, quatro dias depois de seu lançamento em mais de 20 países. Breno Macmasi e Paulo Stool seriam os primeiros em todo o mundo a realizar o feito.

O desbloqueio permite o uso do telefone para chamadas e outros recursos oferecidos, sem a necessidade de uma operadora autorizada pela Apple.

Para efetuar o desbloqueio, Macmasi e Stool fizeram alterações no hardware e software do aparelho. O celular foi conseguido por meio de amigos que moram nos Estados Unidos.

O iPhone 3G deve ser lançado no Brasil ainda em 2008, mas depende de homologação pela Anatel (Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações). Enquanto isso, o uso do aparelho é irregular no País.

Anatel Homologa iPhone 3G para Venda no Brasil | BaixeBr Download | Tecnologia Dicas e Tutoriais.

quarta-feira, 13 de agosto de 2008

Narnia, una interpretación para padres de familia (1 de 7)


Um filme algo polêmico nos meios católicos foi alvo de uma experiência interessante. Reuniram-se crianças de orientação católica para assistir ao filme “O Leão, a Bruxa e o “ . Entre as cenas, o filme era parado para que as crianças fizessem comentários. O artigo abaixo descreve como foi esta experiência e o que se aprendeu delas. Mauro Demarchi


Narnia, una interpretación para padres de familia (1 de 7)
“Homo per virtutes iustificatur”
(Santo Tomás, II-II, q.4 a 5)

Francisco Sunderland
Colección Las crónicas de Narnia (7 libros + lámpara)
C. S. Lewis



Catequesis


Leer los libros sobre Narnia y ver la película “El León, la Bruja y el Ropero” causaron en muchas personas una fuerte impresión. Quien se acercó a Narnia intuyó que allí había mucho más que aventuras fabulosas o cuentos entretenidos.

En esta serie de artículos se narra lo que Narnia pudo haber evocado en la mente y en el corazón de un público católico. Tanto los libros como la película pueden ser utilizados como medios catequéticos. Precisamente estas líneas quieren ser una voz de fe; quieren ser un comentario católico en medio de la familia que esté disfrutando de la película producida por los estudios Walt Disney.

Estas notas, que podríamos llamar una “pequeña guía para padres”, nacieron accidentalmente. Niños de once y doce años son los verdaderos autores de estos comentarios e ideas. Estas ideas vienen en ayuda de los padres que quisieran aprovechar un momento de entretenimiento para infundir en sus hijos el amor hacia su fe católica.

Varios grupos de niños se reunieron para ver la película. Sabían que verían el film, pero que lo detendrían en varias ocasiones para tratar de entender la enseñanza que tal o cual escena les dejaba como católicos. Los resultados asombraron pues con cada nuevo grupo de niños surgían nuevas y más profundas reflexiones. “El León, la Bruja y el Ropero”, es una de esas pocas películas que pueden verse diez veces y aún no agota su contenido pedagógico, didáctico o catequético.

De utilidad para los padres

El autor de los libros sobre Narnia no era un hombre católico; era meramente cristiano. Por ello, lo que los niños vieron en la película probablemente no es lo que el autor quería dar a entender. Tal vez los niños estuvieron lejos del significado original del autor. Pero los niños no pretendían interpretar la intención original del autor. Ellos querían fortalecer y comprender mejor su fe ayudados por una película que les inspiraba elementos de verdad, de bondad y de belleza. Como niños formados en una escuela católica, veían espontáneamente el simbolismo y el significado de ciertos pasajes.

Sin embargo durante las reuniones de los niños para ver la película se notaba que en algunos puntos clave del film, una buena sugerencia de lo que tal o cual elemento podría significar, les llevaba a una vivencia más profunda de la película.

Esta labor de sugerencia es para los padres del niño. Si los padres se sientan a ver ésta y otras películas o programas de televisión con sus hijos, serán capaces de convertir un momento de convivencia en un momento formativo.

Ojalá que las siguientes líneas sean de utilidad a los padres de familia la próxima vez que vean “El León, la Bruja y el Ropero” con sus hijos. Sería también maravilloso que estas notas fuera una motivación para tomar en mano el Catecismo de la Iglesia Católica y la Biblia para profundizar la propia fe. No hay mejor estudiante que aquel que quiere aprender.

Las virtudes cardinales

Las cuatro virtudes cardinales


Narnia, una interpretación para padres de familia (1 de 7).